The Economic Data Global Express (e-EDGE)
v.4 n.29 Released July 17, 2000
Produced
by the Los Angeles County
Economic Development Corporation as a public service to the global
community.
UNEMPLOYMENT UP AGAIN IN JUNE
California's unemployment rate edged up to 5.2%
in June from 5.1% in May and a decades low of 4.8% in April (these figures
are adjusted for normal seasonal variation). June's rate was unchanged
from June 1999.
The unemployment rate for the 5-county Los
Angeles metro area rose to 4.9% in June from 4.6% in May but was down by
0.2 percentage points compared to June 1999 (local area figures are not
seasonally adjusted). The jobless rate declined in Los Angeles County
month-to-month but increased in the other four counties. Los
Angeles, with a jobless rate of 5.3%, was the only county to register a
lower unemployment rate year-over-year, down 0.5 percentage points compared
to June 1999. June's unemployment rates in Orange and Ventura Counties,
at 2.8% and 4.4% respectively, were unchanged from June 1999. On
the other hand, jobless rates increased year-over-year in the Inland Empire.
San Bernardino County's joblessness, at 5.5%, was up by 0.1 percentage
points, while Riverside County registered 5.8% unemployment, up by 0.5
percentage points. San Diego's unemployment rate was 3.3% in June,
up from 2.8% in May but unchanged from June 1999.
Unemployment also increased month-to-month
up north but declined on a year-to-year basis. The jobless rate in
the 8-county Bay Area averaged 2.8% in June, up from 2.4% in May.
At 2.2%, San Jose led the region, while the San Francisco metro area's
unemployment rate came in at 2.4%. Compared to last year, San Francisco's
unemployment rate was down by 0.2 points while San Jose's rate plunged
by 1.1 percentage points. No wonder Bay Area firms report difficulties
hiring enough workers! On the other hand, double-digit unemployment
rates are common in most of California's Central Valley. The Sacramento
area is the notable exception. Metropolitan Sacramento's jobless
rate was up month-to-month, but registered only 4.4% in June. (Nancy
D. Sidhu)
PR: http://www.edd.ca.gov/nwsrel07.htm
JUNE EMPLOYMENT TREND STILL HEALTHY
California's economy continued to churn out new
jobs during June, despite the winding down of some Census jobs. Total
nonfarm employment moved up by 3.1% or 428,200 jobs over the year.
By sector, the largest absolute gains over the year came in services, government,
construction and retailing. The state's manufacturing sector continued
to shed jobs, down by 4,600. However, the aerospace sector seems
to have leveled off, while electronics employment is moving back into a
growth mode.
In Southern California, the June employment
data also made for generally good reading. Los Angeles County posted
a 2.2% or 87,900 gain over 1999, in line with recent results.
The largest absolute job gains were in services and government. Manufacturing
continued to sink, with a loss of 12,700 jobs over the year. Aerospace
dropped 10,000, while apparel lost 3,100 jobs. The motion picture
production employment numbers continue to mystify. The industry's
job count has moved up since April, despite the SAG strike. The June
job number was above the year-ago level by 10,600. Yet, the industry
trade papers talk of tough times for supplier firms due to the strike.
Nonfarm employment in Orange County moved
ahead by 2.8% or by 37,600 in June, the slowest growth so far this year.
The largest job gains were in services and construction. The County's
manufacturing sector continues to post modest growth, with the aerospace
sector moving essentially sideways. Layoffs recently announced by
Boeing have yet to take place. The Riverside-San Bernardino area
continued to set the local growth pace, with a 4.5% or 41,700 increase
in jobs in June. Again, the pace of growth eased. The big gainers
were services, government and construction. The area's manufacturing
sector also continued to record solid job gains.
San Diego County saw nonfarm job growth moderate
in June, with only a 2.2% or 25,300 job increase. This was the slowest
rate of increase so far in 2000. The growth leaders were retailing,
services and government. And the County's manufacturing sector continued
in a modest growth mode. Ventura County also saw job growth ease
in June, up 2.5% or 6,500 jobs. Again, this was the slowest pace
of any month this year. Ventura's manufacturing sector also continued
to eke out some growth.
In Northern California, the San Francisco
metropolitan area saw nonfarm employment advance by 2.6% or 31,700 jobs.
In San Jose, the pace was more moderate, a gain of 1.8% or 17,100 jobs.
(Jack Kyser)
PR: http://www.calmis.cahwnet.gov/file/lfmonth/cal1$pr.txt
IMF TAKES A HIT FROM G-7 FINANCE MINISTERS
The finance ministers of the seven leading industrialized
countries (G-7) met in Fukuoka, Japan, last week and fired off a "zinger
missile" at the IMF. As a result, the dialog regarding the role and
effectiveness of the IMF has been raised to a higher level, culminating
3 years of criticism over the institution's lending policies and mode of
operation. Much of this was triggered by the IMF's response to the
1997 East Asian crisis and the 1998 Russian debt default.
The G-7 proposed reform plan would encourage
more private lending to "middle-income" countries and discourage reliance
by certain countries on prolonged IMF lending facilities. The plan
would exempt the poorest countries from these constraints. Later
this week, the G-7 heads of state will hold their Economic Summit in Okinawa
and the agenda includes debt forgiveness for the poorest countries.
It will be interesting to see whether the G-7 leaders can agree on this
issue and broader reform of the IMF's role. We are fortunate that
the global financial markets have been crisis-free since the Brazilian
episode of early 1999.
Japan's demand for more voting rights within
the IMF for Asian countries has to be dealt with. Most member countries
have also called for an enhanced surveillance role for the IMF that would
detect early warning signs of financial crisis. Given the continuing disarray
of the IMF, a new Managing Director, key resignations of senior staff specialists,
and serious loss of credibility, one has to wonder how the next crisis
will be handled. This scenario is more than just a bit scary.
Check your blood pressure frequently in the months ahead. Sleepless
in Los Angeles. (Ken Ackbarali)
PRICE PRESSURE--TROUBLES AHEAD
The Producer Price Index (PPI) for finished goods
rose 0.6% in June, the largest monthly increase since the 0.9% increase
in March. Once again it's the sharp increase of energy prices (+5.1%)
leading the pack. Food prices dropped 0.3% and the core PPI, which
excludes the more volatile food and energy prices, declined by 0.1%.
The core PPI--fluctuating between +0.3% and -0.2% monthly change since
October--shows little sign of accelerating price inflation at the wholesale
level. However, the total PPI's seasonally adjusted annual rate of
change for the first six months of 2000 is +4.8%, significantly higher
than the +2.9% in 1999 and 0.0% in 1998. (In 1997, the first year
of Asian economic crisis, PPI for finished goods dropped 1.2%.) The
PPI for intermediate goods rose 0.9% mainly because of a 4.7% increase
in energy prices. The PPI for crude goods rose 5.8% as energy prices
rose 16.2%. Crude oil prices rebounded back above $30/barrel for
much of June. Global oil production actually decreased in June despite
promised production increases.
The U.S. Import Price Index report shows that
import prices rose 0.8% in June, thanks to a 7.0% increase in petroleum
prices. Export prices declined by 0.1%. The increased cost
of petroleum will trickle down to consumer products if petroleum production
does not increase sufficiently.
There are now concerns over heating oil stocks
for the coming winter. Some of the normal heating oil stock-building
resources are being diverted to gasoline production. Currently heating
oil inventory is about half of the June 1999 volume. If this persists,
low inventory levels will present a serious problem for the coming winter
especially given that natural gas prices have also doubled in the past
12 months. The futures market prices for December delivery is about $4.30/Kcf
(thousand cubic feet), compared to about $2.10/Kcf in July 1999.
Clinton's proposal for a heating oil reserve in the Northeast is nice but
will probably be inadequate. (George
Huang)
PPI PR: http://www.bls.gov/news.release/ppi.nr0.htm
Export/Import Prices PR: http://www.bls.gov/news.release/ximpim.nr0.htm
AIRLINE PASSENGER TRAFFIC STILL STRONG IN MAY
Total passenger traffic at Los Angeles International
Airport in May increased 6.6% over the year, helped by a 13.0% jump in
international traffic. Ontario posted a 2.8% increase in May, while
Palm Springs came in with a 4.3% gain. However, the news was not
quite so cheery at Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena, as May traffic at that facility
fell 0.5% over the year. BGP has posted a string of 8 consecutive
months of year-to-year declines in traffic.
Air cargo tonnage also increased in May, with
LAX posting a 2.3% increase, while Ontario came in with a huge 43.1% gain.
International air freight tonnage at LAX continued to roll along, with
May arrivals up 9.8% over the year and departures ahead 11.4%. (Jack
Kyser)
MAY HOTEL TRENDS ALSO STRONG
According to PKF Consulting, hotel occupancy rates
in Los Angeles County during May came in at 77.7%, compared with 72.6%
a year ago. The average daily room rate moved up 6.7% to $123.09.
This performance was attributed to strong levels of business and tourist
travel. Six areas in the County came in at or above the 80% occupancy
level, including: Marina del Rey at 86.8%; South Bay, 84.9%; Valencia,
82.5%; Santa Monica, 82.2%; LAX, 80.7%; and the San Fernando Valley, 80.3%.
Business also held up in Orange County, with
a May occupancy rate of 74.5% compared with 65.9% last year. The
room rate increased 5.1% to $106.01. The strongest sub-markets were
south county and the airport area, but none made it to the magic 80% level.
The PKF data on San Diego County also pointed to a healthy level of business.
The May occupancy rate was 77.5%, versus 75.8% last year, while the room
rate moved up 4.4% to $136.76. Two sub-markets were above 80%:
Sports Arena/Old Town at 83.7% and downtown at 82.4%. In Ventura
County, the May hotel occupancy rate was 67.1% compared with 61.6% last
year, while the room rate advanced 9.2% to $78.67. And the Camarillo
market posted a June occupancy of 84.1%. (Jack
Kyser)
POLA HAS A BUSY JUNE
We're in peak shipping season, and the June data
from the port of Los Angeles (POLA) was impressive. The number of
loaded import containers was up 30.5% over the year, while loaded export
containers were ahead 17.4%. POLA also handled 110,304 empties during
the month. June was the third month in a row that the port moved
over 400,000 containers, and so far traffic is flowing smoothly.
Cross your fingers! (Jack Kyser)
QUICK STATS:
* Cal EDD: California unemployment rate for 6/00: 5.2% (5/00: 5.1%)
* Cal EDD: California nonfarm employment for 6/00: +46,500 (5/00: +23,400)
* Cal EDD: LA County unemployment rate for 6/00: 5.4% (5/00: 5.7%)
* Cal EDD: LA County nonfarm employment for 6/00: -8,600 (5/00: +30,700)
* Cal Assn of Realtors: California housing affordability index for
5/00: 29% (4/00: 31%)
* Cal Assn of Realtors: LA County housing affordability index for 5/00:
36% (4/00: 33%)
* Census: US wholesale trade for 5/00: +0.4% (4/00: +0.3%)
* Census: US wholesale inventories for 5/00: +0.8% (4/00: +0.9%)
* Census: US retail trade for 6/00: +0.5% (5/00: +0.3%)
* Census: US business sales for 5/00: +1.0% (4/00: -0.6%)
* Census: US business inventories for 5/00: +0.8% (4/00: +0.5%)
* Federal Reserve: US industrial production for 6/00: +0.2% (5/00:
+0.5%)
* Federal Reserve: US industrial capacity utilization for 6/00: 82.1%
(5/00: 82.2%)
The Economic Data Global Express (e-EDGE) is a free service of the Los Angeles County Economic Development Corporation (LAEDC). Permission to quote any proprietary part of this release is granted given proper credit. Distribution is allowed provided that no modifications are made to the original content. Sponsors of this service do not necessarily endorse all opinions stated herein. For more information, please e-mail to research@laedc.org. To contact LAEDC, please call 213-622-4300.
Subscribe to e-EDGE and receive current economic news and major developments. Your e-mail address will not be disclosed to any outside party (including e-EDGE sponsors) under any circumstances.
To send us comments regarding e-EDGE, please e-mail to research@laedc.org.