The Economic Data Global Express (e-EDGE)
v.5 n.2 Released Jan. 8, 2001
Produced
by the Los Angeles County
Economic Development Corporation as a public service to the global
community.
FED SURPRISE RATE CUT HELPS--BUT WHAT'S NEXT?
Did economic conditions and the outlook change
that much between December 19, 2000, when the FOMC last met and decided
to keep interest rates unchanged, and January 3, 2001, when the Fed boldly
cut the Fed Funds Rate by 50 basis points? The situation deteriorated
more than expected in the following areas: consumer confidence as measured
by the Conference Board, the National Purchasing Managers' Index, stress
in bank credit quality, announcements of worker layoffs, and the negative
wealth effect of a falling stock market. In this environment we are
fortunate to have a Federal Reserve chief who cares more about doing what's
best for the nation's economy than protecting his personal reputation.
In short, Greenspan should be applauded for having the courage to act on
his convictions and worrying less about being accusations of waiting too
long to ease monetary policy.
Financial markets are already anticipating
a follow-up cut in interest rates at the scheduled January 30-31 meeting
of the FOMCand this is quite likely to occur. What happens beyond
this action will depend not only on the economic data that documents the
degree of slowing in the national economy but also on the likelihood of
a an early tax cut. If the Fed sees an early tax cut in the
cards and one that would be simulative to economic growth, its interest
rate cuts would be less aggressive. On the other hand, if the tea
leaves signal a modest tax cut late in 2001 and a modest one, then the
Fed's burden to stimulate the economy becomes heavier.
So, we anticipate the Fed Funds Rate to fall
from today's 6.00% to a range of 5.50% to 5.00% during the first half of
2001. A recession or hard landing can still be avoided. (Ken
Ackbarali)
U.S. LABOR MARKETS: SLOWDOWN UNDER WAY
The Bureau of Labor Statistics released its final
Employment Situation report for the year 2000 last Friday. In general,
the data indicated the supply of labor in this country is still very tight
while demand for labor is weakening somewhat. According to the Bureau's
survey of households, the nation's unemployment rate was 4.0% in December,
level with November's 4.0% and just below the 4.1% registered in December
1999. The national jobless rate has zigged and zagged up and down
in the same low, narrow band (3.9% to 4.1%) ever since October 1998.
Little month-to-month variation was visible
in December for the major worker groups, except for workers of Hispanic
origin whose unemployment rate fell by 0.3 percentage points to 5.7%.
Looking at the hiring side of the labor market,
the BLS survey revealed that total nonfarm payrolls increased by only 105,000
workers in December, up slightly from monthly increases of 59,000 workers
in November and 66,000 workers in October. Hiring by the private
sector has accounted for all of the new jobs created over the past several
months, as government hiring has been negligible. However, the pace
of private job creation declined to a monthly average of 84,000 net new
jobs in the fourth quarter, only one-half as the average of 167,000 new
positions created during the first nine months of 2000. Manufacturing
payrolls exhibited the most weakness in December, declining by 62,000 jobs.
This drop was not unexpected given the auto industry's recent sales troubles.
Reduced vehicle assembly schedules for the first quarter mean that job
counts at the Big Three and their suppliers will decline some more.
On the upside, service industries produced December's biggest gains, rising
by 81,000 jobs. However, job counts at business services firms, which
have been a sturdy engine of growth in past years, declined for the 3rd
consecutive month. Employment at "personnel supply houses" led the
dropoff. This decline reflects reduced use of temporary workers by
manufacturers who want to reduce production but still hope to retain their
permanent employees until sales turn up again.
Some other findings of December's payroll
survey suggest that future reports on the U.S. economy for December and
beyond may prove worrisome. (1) The Bureau's measures of labor input,
"aggregate hours of production," registered declines in December.
Total manufacturing hours dropped by 2.4%, suggesting that manufacturing
output probably declined last month. And the 0.7% decline in aggregate
hours worked in all nonfarm industries means that growth in wages and salaries,
the largest component of personal income, also was weak. (2) Average
hourly earnings of private nonfarm workers rose by 5 cents in December.
This increase sounds pretty innocuous, but it pushed the year-to-year gain
up to 4.2%, the highest such increase since July 1998, and raises concerns
about the impact of rising labor costs in a slowing economy. (Nancy
D. Sidhu)
PR: http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm
NEW HOMEBUILDING CONTINUES TO LAG
New homebuilding in California continues to disappoint.
According to the Construction Industry Research Board, the total number
of permits issued in November was up modestly over the year, and the year-to-date
total is running just 5.0% ahead of the like 1999 period. This points
to a permit total for the year of 144,900 units, nowhere enough to meet
demand.
In Los Angeles County, the 11-month total
was up by 20.3% over the like 1999 period, with the multiple unit sector
running 33.4% ahead. Orange County's 11-month total was up a modest
2.0%, with the most strength again in the multiple sector. The Riverside-San
Bernardino area's 11-month count was ahead a miniscule 0.9%, but at 20,130
units it still leads the state. San Diego County continued to lag,
down 6.0% from 1999. Ventura County was up just 1.3% over the year.
In the Bay Area, the San Francisco metropolitan
area's 11-month housing unit total was up by 21.4%, with the multiple sector
providing the punch. San Jose's 11-month total, however, lagged,
off by 3.1%. And the Oakland area was ahead a modest 1.5%.
(Jack Kyser)
NONRESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION MIXED IN NOVEMBER
The Construction Industry Research Board's November
report pointed to some interesting shifts in development activity.
In Los Angeles County, the 11-month total for new industrial permit valuations
was ahead of last year by a modest 4.4%. New office permit valuations
were still running behind by 33.3%, but retail was up 12.9%. The
pending shut-down of Wards puts an interesting spin on this sector, especially
for a Wards location in a regional mall. Existing anchor stores have
veto rights, so it will be very hard to find a large replacement.
In Orange County industrial permits were off
34.1%, while office valuations were up by 30.2% and retail 7.7%.
In the Riverside-San Bernardino area, new industrial permit valuations
were up 9.6%, but the rate of growth has definitely eased over the year.
The office sector was running ahead of 1999 by 8.0%, again with a shrinkage
of the growth rate. Retail activity was still charging ahead (irrational
exuberance?), with an increase of 43.0%. There are a Ward or two
in the Inland Empire as well. In San Diego County, industrial and
office permit valuations continued to lag (-16.5% and 20.9%, respectively)
but retail was up 17.2%. In Ventura County, new office permit valuations
for 11 months were up by 140.1%, but the base is small, just $32.1 million
so far this year.
In the 9-county Bay Area, industrial permits
for 11 months were down by 6.0%, while retail was off 5.7%. However,
office permit valuations are now up 249.3%, due to the same culprits, San
Francisco and San Jose. (Jack
Kyser)
TRADE VALUES STRONG IN OCTOBER
The value of exports and imports through California's
three customs districts continued to run at a strong pace in October.
The Los Angeles District saw export values increase by 20.6% over the year,
while import values advanced 20.9% to hit a new monthly high of $15.2 billion.
The total value of trade for the month was up by 20.8% to $22.5 billion.
Growth was even more dramatic at the San Francisco
District. Exports shot ahead 39.0%, while imports increased by 25.2%.
For the month, total trade values increased 31.1% to $11.9 billion.
San Francisco's 10-month total was at $105.0 billion, up by 23.4% over
the year. At the San Diego District, imports were up 14.3%, while
export values increased by 15.0%. Total trade value for October was
$$3.2 billion, an increase over the year of 14.7%, and the 10-month total
was at $29.2 billion, up by 18.8%.
And now, the update on the Los Angeles versus
New York total trade value race. The latter's total was at $186.8
billion, while Los Angeles is up to $190.0 billion (this exceeded the like
1999 total by 18.1%). (Jack
Kyser)
NOVEMBER AIRPORT TRAFFIC SO-SO
Total passenger traffic at Los Angeles International
in November was up a modest 1.9% in November. The weakness was in
domestic traffic, while international activity was up 6.5% over the year.
At Ontario International, November traffic was up 2.4%. John Wayne
Orange County Airport saw passenger traffic advance 1.6% over the year.
There had been declines in the 3 previous months. Palm Springs posted
a decline of 0.4% for the month, the sixth consecutive month of weak activity.
On the air cargo front, LAX posted a 2.3%
increase over the year, while Ontario was off 19.6% (reflecting the end
of service by an air freight firm). On the international air cargo
front at LAX, departure tonnage in November was down 2.4%, while arrivals
were off 1.5%. Total international cargo tonnage was down over the
year by 1.9%, yielding two months of weak activity out of the last three.
We watch this indicator because it reflects movement of time-sensitive,
high-value shipments, and could be indicative of the mood of business.
(Jack Kyser)
LOCATION PRODUCTION DAYS ZOOM IN DECEMBER, BUT DOWN FOR YEAR
According to the Entertainment Industry Development
Corporation (EIDC), location production activity picked up in December,
with a 10.7% increase over the year. The biggest increases came in
TV (+20.9%) and features (+10.2%). While up from November, the number
of commercial location days was still 1.6% behind last year. For
the year 2000, the number of location production days was down by 5.7%.
Features were down by 9.9%, but TV climbed 8.2%. Location production
days for commercials dropped 24.6% from 1999 to 2000, reflecting the SAG
strike against commercial producers.
According to the Hollywood Reporter, box office
receipts for 2000 were up 3.1% over 1999, a decent revival thanks in part
to a Grinch and a Castaway (but don't forget a Titan or the parent from
hell). And the status of labor negotiations? Still quite iffy.
(Jack Kyser)
QUICK STATS:
* Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi/Shroders Wertheim: US chain-store sales for
12/00 (% change from 12/99): +0.7% (11/00 from 11/99: +4.0%)
* BEA: US vehicle sales for 12/00: -6.6% to 15.5 mil. seasonally adjusted
annual rate (11/00: -1.8% to 16.6mil. s.a.a.r.)
* BLS: US unemployment rate for 12/00: 4.0% (11/00: 4.0%)
* BLS: US nonfarm employment for 12/00: +105,000 (11/00: +59,000)
* Census: US new home sales for 11/00: -2.2% to 909,000 annual units
(10/00: -1.1% to 929K a.u.)
* Census: US for construction spending 11/00: -0.6% (10/00: +0.8%)
* Census: US new factory orders for 11/00: +1.7% (10/00: -4.0%)
* Census: US factory shipments for 11/00: -0.4% (10/00: -1.2%)
* Census: US unfilled factory orders for 11/00: +0.6% (10/00: -0.7%)
* Census: US factory inventories for 11/00: +0.5% (10/00: +0.7%)
* Federal Reserve: US consumer credit for 11/00: +10.2% (10/00: +7.5%)
The Economic Data Global Express (e-EDGE) is a free service of the Los Angeles County Economic Development Corporation (LAEDC). Permission to quote any proprietary part of this release is granted given proper credit. Distribution is allowed provided that no modifications are made to the original content. Sponsors of this service do not necessarily endorse all opinions stated herein. For more information, please e-mail to research@laedc.org. To contact LAEDC, please call 213-622-4300.
Subscribe to e-EDGE and receive current economic news and major developments. Your e-mail address will not be disclosed to any outside party (including e-EDGE sponsors) under any circumstances.
To send us comments regarding e-EDGE, please e-mail to research@laedc.org.