The Economic Data Global Express (e-EDGE)
v.5 n.41 Released Oct. 9, 2001
Don't forget to fill out the 9-11 Impact & Recovery survey:
http://www.laedc.org/911survey.htm
Produced
by the Los Angeles County
Economic Development Corporation as a public service to the global
community.
U.S. LABOR MARKET DISMAL IN SEPTEMBER
The Bureau of Labor Statistics released its monthly
labor market report for September last Friday and the results were pretty
dismal. Nonfarm employment plunged last month by 199,000 jobs, the
largest monthly decline since February 1991, near the bottom of the 1990-91
recession. Nonfarm jobs fell by a revised 84,000 jobs in August.
The nation's count was over 132 million in total last month, but only 120,000
positions higher than September 2000. Most industries cut jobs in
September, and many have reduced head counts since last year. Private-sector
employment dropped by 196,000 over the month and has fallen by 286,000
positions, or 2.5%, over the year. As it has been all year, manufacturing
is in much the worst shape, with a month-to-month decline of 93,000 jobs
and a whopping year-to-year loss of 972,000 jobs, or 5.3%.
The Bureau's survey of households showed the
nation's unemployment rate was 4.9% last month, the same as in August though
up a full percentage point from 3.9% in September 2000. The number
of unemployed persons has risen by almost 1.5 million over the past 12
months, while the ranks of the employed have decreased slightly.
Neither of these surveys shed much light on
labor market conditions since the September 11 Attacks on New York City
and Washington. The reason is the September survey period included
time both before and after the Attacks. The payroll survey covered
nonfarm workers on employers' payrolls during the pay period (week/fortnight/month)
including September 12. Those who were working on Monday September
10 but were laid off later in the pay period were counted in last month's
survey. Similarly, the household survey week began September 9 and
ran through the 15th. Anyone working even one hour during that week
also was counted as employed.
This report's only clue that SOMETHING was
going on last month is buried deep in the details. Table A-4 reveals
the number of persons working part-time for economic reasons--their hours
had been reduced due to weaker sales, for instance--soared by 860,000 in
September. This result makes sense. Many firms closed up shop
for a day or so immediately after the Attacks and re-opened later in the
week. We'll simply have to wait another month to get the official
reports. Rising weekly claims for unemployment compensation suggest
the news won't be pleasant. (Nancy
D. Sidhu)
PR: http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm
Job cuts resulting from 9-11: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/aponline/20011005/aponline133638_000.htm
CONSUMERS PULL BACK ON BORROWING AS JOB CUTS MOUNT
Consumers raised their use of credit in August
by a relatively small amount and actually lowered their debt in the two
previous months, reflecting their concerns about job cuts and high
debt-servicing burdens. In August, consumer credit outstanding increased
by only $2.3 billon or at an annualized rate of 1.7%. This came on
the heels of decreases in June and July, of $1.8 billion and $600 million
respectively. The trends of the latest three months represent a major
shift from a frenzy of borrowing earlier in the year, when debt rose at
annualized rates of 10.3% in the first quarter, 10.8% in April, and 5.1%
in May.
Consumers have become less enthusiastic about
adding to their debt load for the following reasons: (1) the continuous
announcements of worker layoffs have dented feelings about job security;
(2) the "negative wealth effect" of the stock market downturn has impacted
consumer optimism (3) debt ratios are at record highs; (4) Federal
Reserve interest rate cuts have had only a modest impact on many consumer
lending rates.
The September figures on consumer borrowing
are likely to reflect the effects of the September 11th terrorist attack
and the repayment of debt from tax refund checks. So, over the immediate
period ahead, with the nation at war in Afghanistan and the reality of
recession sinking into consumers' consciousness, we can expect to see a
more conservative attitude towards household finances. Consumers
seem to be answering a wake up call to change their somewhat profligate
ways? (Ken Ackbarali)
NEW HOMEBUILDING MIXED IN AUGUST
New homebuilding activity in California was mixed
in August, according to the latest report from the Construction Industry
Research Board. For the State, the number of permits issued during
the month was up both over the year and from the previous month.
For 8 months of 2001, the unit count was ahead of last year by just 1.1%.
Around Southern California, similar trends
were evident in Los Angeles, Orange and Ventura counties, as well as the
Riverside-San Bernardino area. At the 8-month mark, the permit total
in Los Angeles County was running 13.0% ahead of last year, while Riverside-San
Bernardino was up by 23.3%. However, the 8-month totals for Orange
and Ventura counties continued to lag, by 37.3% and 2.6%, respectively.
In San Diego County, housing permit totals for August were down over both
the month and year, while the 8-month total was off by 3.4%
In the Bay Area, the Oakland area's 8-month
housing unit total lagged last year by 11.9%, the San Francisco area was
behind by 31.2%, while the San Jose area was down by 16.6%. (Jack
Kyser)
NONRESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION LACKLUSTER IN AUGUST
And that is probably good. In Los Angeles
County for the first 8 months, industrial permit values were down by 46.3%,
while retail was off by 2.6%. Office permit values at the 8-month
mark, however, were above last year by 147.5%, It should be noted
that Los Angeles leads the state in retail permit valuations, with Home
Depot, Target and Wal-Mart seemingly intent on carpeting the County with
stores. In Orange County, industrial permit values at 8 months were
up by 84.9% over the like 2000 period. However, office and retail
were down, by 49.6% and 19.2%, respectively.
In the Riverside-San Bernardino area, office
permit values for 8 months were up by 45.5%, but industrial and retail
were behind last year, by 27.1% and 12.7%, respectively. In San Diego
County, permit values for all 3 sectors at the 8-month mark were behind,
with industrial down 51.6%, office off by 4.6%, and retail down 21.4%.
In contrast, in Ventura County all 3 sectors were above last year, by 57.4%,
42.6% and 107.8%, respectively.
In the Bay Area, nonresidential construction
activity at the 8-month mark was also mixed. Industrial permit valuations
were down by 18.0%, while office was off by 2.6% (although the San Jose
area has authorized $340 million in new facilities despite rising vacancy
rates). However, retail permit valuations were up over the year,
by 31.0% (with San Jose up by 60.7%). (Jack
Kyser)
AIRLINE TRAFFIC GOOD IN AUGUST
After a lackluster performance over most of the
year, total passenger traffic in August at LAX was up by 3.6% over the
year. International inched up by 0.3%, while domestic traffic advanced
4.8%. Ontario chipped in with a 7.9% increase over the year, while
John Wayne/Orange County recorded an 8.6% gain, its biggest in quite some
time. The Palm Springs Airport also had a good August, with an 8.2%
gain. Talk about irony.
On the air cargo front, the August news wasn't
as sparkling. LAX saw volume decline over the year by 13.7%, while
Ontario's tonnage declined by 29.8%. International air cargo at LAX
continued in its lackadaisical ways, with export tonnage down by 7.9% over
the year, while import tonnage dropped by 13.2%. Total international
air cargo tonnage was down by 11.1%. (Jack
Kyser)
SEPTEMBER FILM LOCATION ACTIVITY REMAINS WEAK
According to the Entertainment Industry Development
Corporation (EIDC), total off-lot production days in September were down
by 1.8% over the year. Feature production days were off by 22.7%,
while TV fell by 7.7%. This reduced activity continues to reflect
the "de facto" strike situation in the film industry. However, after
9/11, the EIDC reports an upswing in information requests on potential
local locations.
In other film news, Canada's government is
considering doing away with an attractive tax shelter that had helped lure
runway production there. Also, Hollywood is also breathing a little
easier over recent box office results. Year-to-date, domestic box
office is running 10.0 % ahead of last year, with public tastes seemingly
unchanged. (Jack Kyser)
ENERGY WATCH: CPUC ACTS FOR SCE (& AGAINST CA?)
The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC)
made a pair of important decisions last week. One of them dramatically
improved the outlook for Southern California Edison's (SCE's) survivability,
while the other created new uncertainty about whether and when the state
of California will be able to sell bonds to recoup billions of dollars
of power purchase costs. This added to California's growing state
budget problems.
Way back in November 2000, SCE filed a lawsuit
in federal court because the CPUC had not allowed SCE to raise its retail
rates when its wholesale costs surged to record high levels, and thereby
had driven the company to the brink of bankruptcy. The settlement,
which has been approved by the federal judge, establishes a plan to repay
SCE's accumulated debts and marks the first step to its eventual recovery.
The most important elements of the plan are: (1) SCE will use its
current cash cushion plus incoming revenues (over and above "recoverable
costs") to pay down its back debts, hopefully by the end of 2003.
(2) Edison International shareholders will receive no dividends (most of
which came out of SCE's operations) until 2005--earlier if all outstanding
debts are repaid. (3) The CPUC cannot raise retail rates any further
for SCE customers through 2003. If all debts are not repaid by then,
today's high rates will continue through 2004-2005 as needed. On
the other hand, rates can be reduced sooner if SCE's debts are fully repaid
and the company's cost conditions warrant. More good news:
as a result of this agreement, the debt rating agencies are already starting
the process required to upgrade SCE's debt, which currently has "junk"
status, once the agreement is fully implemented.
On the very same day it OK'd the SCE settlement,
the CPUC rejected the state's "legal framework" for issuing $12.5 billion
in bonds because it required a portion of retail rates be dedicated to
paying interest on the bonds. The bonds need to be sold in order
to repay the state's General Fund for the cost of electric power it's been
buying on behalf of the three privately-owned electric utilities.
Phil Angelides, the state's Treasurer, had hoped to sell the bonds in August,
then in the fourth quarter. Now the sale will be delayed while the
CPUC, Governor Davis, and other polimas (political movers & shakers)
thrash out a new strategy. Why does all this matter? Without
such repayment, a large deficit looms in the next fiscal year (July 1,
2002 through June 30, 2003). Optimists believe the sale has simply
been delayed again. However, pessimists contend that spending cutbacks
and perhaps tax increases are inevitable unless the General Fund is repaid
fully and soon. Watch this space for the next episode in this thriller.
(Nancy D. Sidhu)
COMMENTARY: TAX CUTS OR SPENDING INCREASES?
President Bush and Congress all agree that the
economy needs a boost, but can't quite agree on the way to do it.
An effective stimulus package should provide immediate impact to the economy
and tackle the root of the problem, if possible. The root of the
current downturn is the weakened consumer confidence caused on one hand
by the terrorist attack and the military conflict and fears of a subsequent
economic recession on the other. Weakened confidence means tightened
wallets. Changing the tax withholdings on paychecks and extending
unemployment compensation can channel money to most workers immediately,
but the real key is to build up confidence by any means available.
Direct spending can be productive if done
wisely. Spending on improving transportation security can boost the
economy and improve confidence at the same time. Some counter-terrorist
efforts also demand funding, such as investment in biochemical warfare
countermeasures, emergency response systems, and public education regarding
these issues. The risk of spending lies in the potential for waste
and continuing outlays once a program is started. This is one reason
why the Administration is resisting new spending programs.
If you are one of those patriotic souls trying
to help and are concerned about terrorist attacks at the same time, consider
buying disaster preparedness supplies such as canned food, batteries, bottled
water, and safe cooking fuel. If you aren't concerned, go get a new
PC or a car (with 0% financing). Right now is a also great time to
buy a new fridge or A/C. Prices will drop as retailers try to keep
sales up and SCE's rebate programs are still on. And if your company
has significant power use, consider installing a solar power system while
the government is still subsidizing up to 50% of the costs.
Finally, perhaps the government can have a
sweepstakes of free vacation packages to New York City. That may
have more bang for the buck than anything else the politicians can ever
cook up... (George Huang)
SCE's rebate programs: http://www.sce.com/002_save_energy/002a1b_2001_her.shtml
Renewable power buydown programs: http://www.consumerenergycenter.org/buydown/index.html
QUICK STATS:
* BLS: US unemployment rate for 9/01: 4.9% (8/01: 4.9%)
* BLS: US nonfarm employment for 9/01: -199,000 (8/01: -84,000)
* Census: US new factory orders for 8/01: -0.0% (7/01: -0.1%)
* Census: US factory shipments for 8/01: -0.5% (7/01: +0.4%)
* Census: US factory inventories for 8/01: -0.7% (7/01: -0.8%)
* Census: US unfilled factory orders for 8/01: -0.7% (7/01: -1.0%)
* BTM: US vehicle sales for 9/01: -3.6% to 15.9 million annual units
(8/01: +0.0% to 16.5mil.a.u.)--expect this number to rise in October due
to 0% financing (and also lower bank financing) being offered
* Federal Reserve: US consumer credit for 8/01: +1.7% (7/01: -0.4%)
The Economic Data Global Express (e-EDGE) is a free service of the Los Angeles County Economic Development Corporation (LAEDC). Permission to quote any proprietary part of this release is granted given proper credit. Distribution is allowed provided that no modifications are made to the original content. Sponsors of this service do not necessarily endorse all opinions stated herein. For more information, please e-mail to research@laedc.org. To contact LAEDC, please call 213-622-4300.
Subscribe to e-EDGE and receive current economic news and major developments. Your e-mail address will not be disclosed to any outside party (including e-EDGE sponsors) under any circumstances.
To send us comments regarding e-EDGE, please e-mail to research@laedc.org.