The Economic Data Global Express (e-EDGE)

v.5 n.49       Released Dec. 3, 2001

Produced by the Los Angeles County Economic Development Corporation as a public service to the global community.

IT'S OFFICIAL:  THE U.S. IS IN A RECESSION

     The U.S. economy entered a recession in March 2001.  How do we know?  NOT because layoffs are high and the national unemployment rate is rising.  Nor because business profits are falling and the number of bankruptcies is surging.  Not even because the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) fell by a downwardly revised 1.1 percent (annual rate) during the third quarter, more than eclipsing the second quarter's meager 0.3 percent gain.  No, the official arbiter of recession timing has spoken and we must all take note.  Who is this person?  It's a committee made up of six academic and research economists, sponsored by the National Bureau of Economic Research (a private non-profit organization) and called the Business Cycle Dating Committee.  Last week the Committee announced the U.S. economy peaked in March 2001, simultaneously ending a record-setting 10-year period of expansion and inaugurating a recession period of unknown length.
     The Committee pored over this year's economic data to see whether recent developments met its three criteria for calling a peak/recession.  These are: (1) a significant decline in economic activity must have taken place; (2) the decline must have spread across many sectors; and (3) the decline must last more than a few months.  The Committee did not even meet through the summer because the weakness in the economy wasn't bad enough or widespread enough to satisfy its criteria.  As documented in past issues of e-Edge, the problems then were mostly confined to technology industries, including the dot.com bust, and manufacturing.  However, the economic downturn deepened following the events of 9/11, and many more industries are feeling the pain.  Thus, the only remaining issue for the Committee was which month to choose as the turning point.  September might seem the obvious choice, but was rejected.  The Committee's view is that the 9/11 Attacks were the last straw for an economy that was already slumping badly.  Instead, the Committee chose March 2001 as the cycle peak because that was the month in which employment, its most general economic indicator, peaked.
     How long will this recession last?  No one knows for sure.  The average length of the previous eight downturns was 11 months, but the shortest (in 1980) lasted only 6 months and the longest (1973-75 and 1981-82) labored on for a full 16 months each.  The current recession is already eight months old; so it's unlikely to be a short one.  Most economists are divided into two camps on this issue. The first expects the economy to turn up right after New Year's Day, for a nine-month downturn, while the second expects a recession of average length or so, delaying the upturn until the spring.  (Nancy D. Sidhu)
PR: http://cycles-www.nber.org/cycles/november2001/recessnov.html
 

CONSUMERS:  FEELING WORSE BUT STILL SPENDING?

     By their actions, U.S. consumers will play an important role in determining the ultimate length, depth, and duration of the current recession.  The Conference Board reports that consumers have been in a funk ever since 9/11.  The Board's Consumer Confidence Index has declined in each of the past three months.  By November, it had plunged by 28 percent from August.  As you might expect, survey respondents were especially worried about rising layoffs and unemployment.  However, expectations for the future also have been dampened.
     The grim confidence statistics suggest U.S. consumers are staying home in droves and out of the stores.  However, the reality is much less drastic.  The Commerce Department just reported that personal consumer spending, after dropping by 1.7% in September, increased by a whopping 2.9 percent in October despite the hangover from 9/11.  Many shoppers were lured into auto dealerships by extremely attractive incentives (who can resist zero interest-rate loans?), most of which have been extended until after the holidays.  Spending for other types of goods and services also increased in October but barely recovered September's losses.  What about November?  The vehicle sales numbers are just starting to come in today.  They are expected to be good but fall short of October's spectacular performance.  On the other hand, weekly retail sales reports from the Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi/UBS Warburg and Instinet Research Redbook, which had been very weak during the second half of September and October, firmed somewhat in November.  (Nancy D. Sidhu)
Personal income PR: http://www.bea.doc.gov/bea/newsrel/pi1001.htm
 

CALIFORNIA HOUSING RESALE MARKET OK IN OCTOBER

     According to the California Association of Realtors (CAR), the number of resale housing units sold in the state in October was down over the year by 9.7%, but the median price was up by 8.5% to $272,570.  One interesting note in the CAR report -- the unsold inventory index (the number of months needed to deplete the supply of available homes at the current sales rate) was 4.1 months compared with 3.0 months a year ago.
     In Los Angeles County, unit sales were up 5.0% over the year, while the median price moved ahead 13.3% to $249,070.  In Orange County, unit sales were up a more modest 0.7% over the year, while the median price moved ahead by 12.1% to $360,080.  The Riverside-San Bernardino area posted an impressive 8.7% increase in unit sales during October, while the median price advanced by 15.0% to $165,890.  Breaking the pattern was San Diego County, where unit sales declined over the year by 1.7%, and median price moved ahead by a comparatively modest 5.4% to $294,250.  No data was available for Ventura County.
     In the Bay Area, October saw more heartbreak.  In the "San Francisco Bay" area, unit sales dropped by 32.9% over the year, while the median price slipped by 1.7% to $455,930.  In the San Jose area, unit sales fell by 43.2% over the year, while the median price dropped by 8.8% to $481,000.  This was the first time this area's price has been under $500,000 since February, 2000.  (Jack Kyser)
PR: http://www.car.org/newsstand/news/nov01-4.html
 

E-COMMERCE RETAILERS FACING A TRICKY HOLIDAY SEASON

     E-commerce retail ("e-tail") sales increased by 0.2% in the 3rd quarter from the 2nd quarter to $7.472 billion.  This may seem disappointing but it's much better than the 2.6% quarter-to-quarter decline in total retail sales.  E-tail sales accounted for 0.95% of the total retail sales volume in 3Q2001.  It had peaked at 1.09% during 4Q2000. Compared to the 3Q2000, e-commerce retail sales rose by 8.3% while total retail sales increased by only 1.8%.  While still outpacing total retail sales, the e-tail increase was the first single-digit year-over-year growth since the such comparisons began in 4Q2000.  (Just for the record, here are the year-over-year growth rates: +68.6% for 4Q00, +37.4% for 1Q01, and +24.7% for 2Q01.)
     E-tailers face a tricky holiday season this year.  First, e-tailing is more seasonal than ordinary retailing, and some desperate e-tailers may yet start a "fire sale" in December in order to stay alive and avoid excess inventories.  This would be good news for consumers but maybe not for those e-tailers that are short on cash.  Second, many e-tailing operations are now just a side business for established retailers, who tend to be better at anticipating consumer tastes and inventory.  But after Sept. 11, all spending forecasts were tossed out of the window.  The only certainty in this environment is uncertainty.  Third, some consumers may still wish to avoid going to the post office and thus would rather have the e-tailers send gift-wrapped products directly to the recipients.  This presents a window of opportunity for e-tailers to make more converts.  Finally, because e-tailers' shopping season really ends about one week before Christmas (because of shipping needs), they may be induced to cut their prices more aggressively if they sense that they are overstocked and would not be able to pare down their excess inventories in a timely fashion.  Consumers have noticed this trend and may hold back just to get a good deal later in the month.  The perfect gift this year might be a gift certificate redeemable at several stores or a mega-retailer.  (George Huang)
PR: http://www.census.gov/mrts/www/current.html
 

COMING UP IN 2002:

     * California's sales tax will increase by 0.25% pts.  The State's share will be 6.00% instead of the current 5.75%.  LA County's total sales tax rate will thus rise from 8.00% to 8.25%.  This increase is mandated by a 1991 law which authorized a drop in State sales tax when the State has a General Fund reserve greater than 3% of the General Funds revenue for two consecutive years.  The State will fail to meet that condition this year due to the decline in personal and corporate income tax revenues.  (PR: http://www.boe.ca.gov/pdf/taxincreasenotice.pdf )  The Office of Legislative Analyst (LAO) is projecting a $4.5 billion deficit for this fiscal year which ends in June, 2002 (PR: http://www.lao.ca.gov/2001/fisc_outlook/fiscal_outlook_2001.pdf ).  The increase in sales tax amounts to around $120 per California family.  If you have been thinking of that new car, get it now with 0% financing and the lower sales tax.  You can save $50 in taxes on a $20,000 car, and $2,000+ on interest charges.
     * The limit on conforming mortgage will go from $275,000 currently to $300,700 in 2002.  With record low mortgage rates, it may be a good time to refinance your existing mortgage and use the extra cash to pay down other higher-interest-rate loans or commitments.  (PR: http://www.fanniemae.com/news/pressreleases/1651.html )
     * TAXES!  The time for year-end tax planning is here.  Check out http://personalfinance.netscape.com/finance/planning/tax.tmpl for some tips and useful tools.
 

QUICK STATS:

* BEA: US Gross Domestic Product (preliminary) for 3Q01: -1.1% (2Q01: +0.3%)
* BEA: US implicit GDP deflator (p) for 3Q01: +2.2% (2Q01: +2.1%)
* BEA: US personal consumption expenditure (p) for 3Q01: +1.1% (2Q01: +2.5%)
* BEA: US gross private domestic investment (p) for 3Q01: -10.7% (2Q01: -12.1%)
* BEA: US total personal income for 10/01: -0.0% (9/01: -0.0%)
* BEA: US disposable personal income for 10/01: -1.7% (9/01: -1.2%)
* BEA: US personal consumption expenditures for 10/01: +2.9% (9/01: -1.7%)
* BEA: US personal savings rate for 10/01: +0.2% (9/01: +4.6%)
* Cal Assn of Realtors: California existing home sales for 10/01: +4.1% to 494,920 seasonally adjusted annual units (9/01: +% to 475,427 s.a.a.r.)
* Cal Assn of Realtors: California median (single-family) home price for 10/01: -1.0% to $272,570 (9/01: -0.1% to $275,300)
* Cal Assn of Realtors: LA County existing home sales for 10/01: -12.3% (9/01: -18.0%)
* Cal Assn of Realtors: LA County median home price for 10/01: -0.6% to $249,070 (9/01: +0.4% to $250,570)
* Census: US e-commerce retail sales for 3Q01: +0.2% (2Q01: -1.8%)
* Census: US new durable goods orders for 10/01: +12.8% (9/01: -9.2%)
* Census: US durable goods shipments for 10/01: +3.2% (9/01: -6.0%)
* Census: US durable goods inventories for 10/01: -0.4% (9/01: -1.1%)
* Census: US unfilled durable goods orders for 10/01: +0.9% (9/01: -1.8%)
* Census: US new home sales for 10/01: +0.2% to 888,000 annual units (9/01: +1.0% to 878K a.u.)
* Census: US construction spending for 10/01: +1.9% (9/01: -0.7%)
* Conference Board: US Consumer Confidence Index for 11/01: 82.2 (10/01: 85.3)
* Conference Board: US Help-Wanted Advertising Index for 11/01: 46 (10/01: 52)
* Natl Assn of Purchasing Mgmt: US manufacturing Purchasing Managers' Index for 11/01: 44.5% (10/01: 39.8%)
* Natl Assn of Realtors: US existing home sales for 10/01: +5.5% to 5.17 million s.a.a.r. (9/01: -11.6% to 4.90mil. s.a.a.r.)
* USDA: US agricultural prices for 11/01: -1.1% (10/01: -10.5%)


The Economic Data Global Express (e-EDGE) is a free service of the Los Angeles County Economic Development Corporation (LAEDC). Permission to quote any proprietary part of this release is granted given proper credit. Distribution is allowed provided that no modifications are made to the original content. Sponsors of this service do not necessarily endorse all opinions stated herein. For more information, please e-mail to research@laedc.org. To contact LAEDC, please call 213-622-4300.

Subscribe to e-EDGE and receive current economic news and major developments.  Your e-mail address will not be disclosed to any outside party (including e-EDGE sponsors) under any circumstances.

To send us comments regarding e-EDGE, please e-mail to research@laedc.org.