The Economic Data Global Express (e-EDGE)
v.6 n.11 Released Mar. 18, 2002
Produced
by the Los Angeles County
Economic Development Corporation as a public service to the global
community.
STATE/LOCAL UNEMPLOYMENT RATES IN FEBRUARY
California's unemployment rate dropped back to
6.1% last month from a revised 6.4% in January. January's rate was
originally estimated as 6.2% but a large number of unemployment claims
were reported late. The state's jobless rate was only 4.7% in February
2001. This lackluster performance was a little worse than the nation
as a whole. The U.S. unemployment rate has increased from 4.2% to
5.5% over the past 12 months. (These figures are all adjusted to
eliminate normal seasonal variation.)
Jobless rates at the county level are not
seasonally adjusted. Typically, employment rises and unemployment
rates edge down a little in February. Southern California unemployment
rates followed this pattern last month. Los Angeles County's jobless
rate fell from 6.8% to 6.4% last month, and Orange County's rate decreased
to 3.6% from 3.9% in January. Unemployment rates also dropped in
Riverside County, down from 5.7% to 5.4%, and San Bernardino County where
joblessness was 5.1%, down from 5.5%. Ventura County registered lower
joblessness as well, falling from 5.5% in January to 4.7% last month.
Compared to February 2001, last month's unemployment rates were noticeably
higher in Los Angeles and Orange counties, up by 1.4 and 1.1 percentage
points respectively. The other three Southern California counties
registered smaller year-to-year increases of 0.4 percentage points in Riverside
County, 0.5 percentage points in San Bernardino County, and 0.7 percentage
points in Ventura County. San Diego's unemployment rate was 3.7%
in February, down from 4.1% in January, and 0.7 percentage points higher
than the 2.8% registered last year. All of the February year-to-year
increases were slightly smaller than they had been in January except for
Los Angeles' increase, which was the same.
Joblessness in Southern California has worsened
noticeably over the past 12 months, with the combined 5-county jobless
rate rising by 1.1 percentage points to 5.6% last month. However,
labor markets have deteriorated dramatically in the Bay Area, though the
year-to-year margin of loss narrowed a little in January. The combined
9-county unemployment rate was 5.7% last month, 3.2 percentage points above
the February 2001 level of 2.5%. San Jose really took it on the chin.
Last month's jobless rate was 7.3%, about four times the February 2001
rate of 1.8%. San Francisco and Alameda counties also registered
big increases. Their unemployment rates were up by 3.1 and 3.7 percentage
points respectively over the past year to 6.6% and 6.1%.
Unemployment continued high in most of the
Central Valley. Compared to last year, however, the Central Valley's unemployment
picture was mixed. The jobless rate in Sacramento County was 5.0%
last month, up from 4.2% in February 2001. Nearby, San Joaquin County's
unemployment rate increased by 0.9 percentage points, to 11.0%. Joblessness
in Fresno and Tulare counties was high but down over the year by 0.9 and
0.5 percentage points to 15.9% and 17.8% respectively. And Imperial
County's jobless rate dropped by 3.8 percentage points, though it still
was high at 14.5%. (Nancy
D. Sidhu)
PR: http://www.edd.ca.gov/nwsrel03.htm
Data: http://www.calmis.cahwnet.gov/file/lfmonth/cal1$pr.txt
MIXED TRENDS IN FEBRUARY EMPLOYMENT DATA
There were mixed trends in the February report
from the California Employment Development Department (EDD). For
the state, nonfarm employment declined over the year by 31,700 jobs, a
larger loss than in January. Manufacturing shed 124,100 jobs, transportation-communications-public
utilities (TCPU) dropped 25,000, services declined by 9,300 jobs, while
wholesale trade lost 6,800. In services, the business service
sector was off by 79,700 jobs over the year. Further slicing the
data, personnel supply lost 35,400 jobs, while computer programming dropped
27,700. EDD noted that total civilian employment, which includes
the self-employed and comes from a separate survey was up over both the
month and year, with the latter increase at 73,600 jobs.
Around Southern California, the February job
trends were also mixed. Los Angeles County lost 21,200 nonfarm
jobs over the year, while total civilian employment was up by 23,100 jobs.
Manufacturing was down by 20,200 jobs, services was off by 14,800, construction
and wholesale trade each lost 1,500, while TCPU was essentially flat over
the year. In the County's service sector, business services dropped
by 19,600 jobs, while motion picture production declined by 16,800 (the
"de facto" strike is still painfully in evidence).
The February employment news was better in
Orange County, with an increase of 16,300 nonfarm jobs over the year, while
total civilian employment was ahead by 18,600. However, it was not
all good news, with manufacturing declining by 9,200 jobs, while TCPU was
flat. The Riverside-San Bernardino area's economy continued to roar
ahead, with nonfarm employment up by 39,100 jobs over the year, while total
civilian employment was up by a thumping 56,000. However, the manufacturing
sector continued to lose jobs, down by 3,000. San Diego County's
February job data was also strong, with nonfarm employment up over the
year by 25,800 jobs and total civilian employment up by 29,800. Again,
there was a decline in manufacturing, with 3,300 jobs disappearing over
the year. TCPU was also off by 1,400 jobs while wholesale trade was
down by 400. Rounding out the Southern California news, Ventura County
added 3,500 nonfarm jobs over the year, while civilian employment was ahead
by 8,500. Manufacturing and wholesale trade, however, were both down
modestly over the year.
In the Bay area, the EDD's February employment
report continued to make for poor reading. In the San Francisco metro
area, nonfarm employment was down by 40,700 jobs over the year, while
civilian employment declined by 26,900 jobs. In the Oakland area,
nonfarm employment was off by 5,600 jobs, while total civilian employment
slipped by 3,600 jobs. Finally, the San Jose area lost 82,400 nonfarm
jobs over the year, while civilian employment dropped by 77,200 jobs.
(Jack Kyser)
CA Data: http://www.calmis.cahwnet.gov/file/lfmonth/cal$pr.txt
LA Data: http://www.calmis.cahwnet.gov/file/lfmonth/la$pr.txt
FEDERAL RESERVE EXPECTED TO HOLD RATES STEADY
The Federal Reserve's Open Market Committee (FOMC)
will hold its scheduled meeting tomorrow to determine whether economic
conditions warrant an increase in its key monetary target, the Fed Funds
Rate (FFR), or hold it steady. The decision will hinge on the FOMC's
assessment as to the U.S. economy's recovery status. Is the recession
over and a recovery underway? Although the evidence that this has
occurred is mounting, it may still not be conclusive enough for some members
of the FOMC.
The factors that are likely to dominate the
FOMC's deliberations and lead to the adoption of a holding stance on interest
rates are:
(1)The need to monitor the interest-sensitive
housing and automobile sectors of the economy, both of which remained strong
all through the recession. Will consumer confidence stay strong and
keep these sectors perking?
(2) Business investment and corporate profits
continue to show weakness--for how many more quarters?
(3) Government spending for the military and
homeland security is certain to be ramped up further in order to counter
various terrorist threats at home and abroad.
(4) Consumer confidence will continue to be
hammered by announcements of large worker layoffs, coming from bankruptcy
filings and mergers.
(5) Global economic conditions are still weak,
in fact abysmal in Japan and tentative in Europe.
(6) Although the stock market has risen in
recent weeks, "Enronitis" has hurt its ability to sustain any traction.
The Federal Reserve can afford to wait until
its June meeting, without much risk, before raising the FFR from its 40-year
low of 1.75%. If the economy's recovery does not turn out to be sustaining
and widespread over the next quarter, the first interest rate hike may
even be delayed until after mid-year. Stay tuned for refinements
to this outlook. (Ken Ackbarali)
PRODUCER PRICES STABLE
The U.S. Producer Price Index (PPI) for finished
goods rose by 0.2% last month, following a 0.1% increase in January.
Energy prices rose by 0.4%, thanks to a 4.5% jump in gasoline prices and
smaller increases in other petroleum-based fuels. Sharp price increases
in vegetable, beef, and fish led to a 1.0% increase in food prices.
Excluding food and energy prices, the core PPI for finished goods was unchanged
last month. The PPI for finished goods was 2.6% below the year-ago
level.
The PPI for intermediate goods fell by 0.1%
in February. This is the fifth consecutive monthly decline.
Food prices were unchanged at this level. Energy costs dropped by
0.7%, thanks to price declines in electric power and natural gas.
The core PPI at this level was also unchanged from a month ago. The
PPI for intermediate goods was 4.4% below the year-ago level.
The PPI for crude goods and raw materials
fell by 0.8% last month, following a 3.7% jump in January. Food prices
rose by 2.3%. Energy costs declined by 6.5%, after a 5.6% increase
in January. Natural gas prices fell by 20.7% last month and were
70.4% below the year-ago level. Crude oil prices jumped 13.3% but
were still 34.6% cheaper than a year ago. Prices for some industrial
materials such as steel and metal ores also rose last month, responding
to the beginning of a recovery in industrial demand. (George
Huang)
PR: http://www.bls.gov/news.release/ppi.nr0.htm
HOTEL BIZ RECOVERING IN JANUARY
According to the latest data from PKF Consulting,
the hotel industry is slowly climbing out of the hole created by the 9/11
attack. For L.A. County, the occupancy rate was 62.4% in January.
While this was down from last year's 69.5% occupancy, it was the strongest
reading for this measure since last August. The average daily room
rate was also down by 3.2% over the year, to $119.41. There were
some strong performances by sub-area in the County as well. Pasadena
posted an 80.4% occupancy (thanks to the BCS game), while Valencia recorded
a 71.9% rate and Santa Monica came in at 70.1% (also BCS).
Orange County hotel occupancy rate in January
was 56.3%, down from 63.3% a year ago. The average daily room rate
was $114.96, down from $118.42 a year ago. The strongest
market was South County with a occupancy rate of 61.5%. Anaheim is
still suffering from the decline in tourism. The occupancy rate in
January was 55.0%, down from 60.0% a year ago (before California Adventure
opened).
Little recovery is in sight in San Francisco,
with a January occupancy rate of 49.9%. However, the news was a tad
brighter for the San Jose/Peninsula area, with a 58.5% reading. This
was the highest since August 2001. (Jack
Kyser)
QUICK STATS:
* BEA: US current account for 4Q01: -US$98.8 billion (3Q01: -$98.5bil.)
* BLS: US Producer Price Index for finished goods for 2/02: +0.2% (1/02:
+0.1%)
* BLS: US Producer Price Index for intermediate goods for 2/02: -0.1%
(1/02: -0.1%)
* BLS: US Producer Price Index for crude goods for 2/02: -0.8% (1/02:
+3.7%)
* BLS: US export prices for 2/02: -0.2% (1/02: -0.1%)
* BLS: US import prices for 2/02: -0.1% (1/02: +0.4%)
* Cal EDD: California unemployment rate for 2/02: 6.1% (1/02: 6.4%)
* Cal EDD: California nonfarm employment for 2/02: +64,700 (1/02: -283,100)
* Cal EDD: LA County unemployment rate for 2/02: 6.4% (1/02: 6.6%)
* Cal EDD: LA County nonfarm employment for 2/02: +21,700 (1/02: -74,700)
* Census: US retail sales for 2/02: +0.3% (1/02: -0.3%)
* Census: US business sales for 1/02: +1.1% (12/01: +0.0%)
* Census: US business inventories for 1/02: +0.2% (12/01: -0.5%)
* Federal Reserve: US industrial production for 2/02: +0.4% (1/02:
+0.2%)
* Federal Reserve: US industrial capacity utilization rate for 2/02:
74.8% (1/02: 74.5%)
* U. Michigan: US Consumer Sentiment Survey for 3/02: 95.0 (2/02: 90.7)
The Economic Data Global Express (e-EDGE) is a free service of the Los Angeles County Economic Development Corporation (LAEDC). Permission to quote any proprietary part of this release is granted given proper credit. Distribution is allowed provided that no modifications are made to the original content. Sponsors of this service do not necessarily endorse all opinions stated herein. For more information, please e-mail to research@laedc.org. To contact LAEDC, please call 213-622-4300.
Subscribe to e-EDGE and receive current economic news and major developments. Your e-mail address will not be disclosed to any outside party (including e-EDGE sponsors) under any circumstances.
To send us comments regarding e-EDGE, please e-mail to research@laedc.org.