The Economic Data Global Express (e-EDGE)
v.6 n.23 Released June 10, 2002
Produced
by the Los Angeles County
Economic Development Corporation as a public service to the global
community.
U.S. LABOR MARKETS A LITTLE BETTER IN MAY
The Bureau of Labor Statistics released its monthly
labor market report Friday showing that labor market conditions improved
slightly in May compared to April. The headline figure was the drop
in the nation's unemployment rate to 5.8% from 6.0% in April and 5.7% in
March. Jobless rates fell for all categories of workers except teenagers.
The biggest declines were registered by blacks (with unemployment down
by a full percentage point to 10.2%), Hispanics (down by 0.9 percentage
points to 7.0%), and workers without a high school diploma (down by 0.5
percentage points to 8.5%). Last month's decline was unexpected but
suggests little change in joblessness last month compared to the March-April
period.
The Bureau's survey of employers also was
somewhat encouraging. Nonfarm employment increased by 41,000 jobs
in May, following a revised increase of 6,000 jobs in April and a revised
decline of 5,000 jobs in March. Though employment is still at a low
level, April and May mark the first two-month period of consecutive upticks
since February-March 2001, just prior to the start of last year's recession.
Also, nonfarm employment was essentially unchanged over the last three
months, a distinct improvement over previous months. Some 1.75 million
jobs disappeared between March 2001 and February 2002.
The industry employment picture for May was
similar to April and March, showing job losses in construction and manufacturing.
(The latter posted its 22nd consecutive month of deterioration. However,
the last two monthly declines were considerably smaller than the large
drops of last year.) Losses in the goods-producing industries during
May were more than offset by an increase of 64,000 jobs in service producing
industries. Industries registering notable increases were:
help supply services, up by 25,000 positions, engineering and management
services, which rose by 23,000 jobs, and health services, up by 13,000
jobs. However, employment at the nation's hotels and other lodging
places declined for the second month in a row and was 5.6% below the May
2001 level.
Data Note: Every year the Bureau of
Labor Statistics revises the nation's recent employment history when it
releases figures for May. Most of these revisions are important only
to statisticians. However, the Bureau also "re-benchmarked" its previously
published figures to incorporate actual employment counts as of March 2001.
These turned out to be lower than the Bureau had been assuming. In
addition, the Bureau reduced its estimates of net new business formations
(i.e., startups minus shutdowns) during the recession (since March 2001).
The net result of all these (re-) calculations was a significant downward
adjustment of 523,000 jobs--or 0.4 percent--to the Bureau's estimate of
total U.S. nonfarm employment in April 2002. Note also that, substantial
as they were, these revisions still do not tell the complete story of the
recession's impact on employment. We won't know that until next year,
when the Bureau makes benchmark revisions based on actual March 2002 job
counts. (Nancy D. Sidhu)
PR: http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm
FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT IN U.S. FELL SHARPLY IN 2001
Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in the United
States fell 60% in 2001 to $132.9 billion from $335.6 billion in 2000.
This sharp decline was a reflection of weakness in U.S. and global economic
activity as well as a drop-off in mergers and acquisitions. Last
year's decline should be viewed in the context of three consecutive years,
1998-2000, of unprecedented volumes of FDI. Last year's FDI
amount was still impressive, more than double the amount in 1995, 66.3%
more than in 1996, and nearly double the 1997 amount.
The largest foreign investors in 2001 were
Canadian ($16.9 bn.), British ($16.6 bn.), Swiss ($15.0 bn.), Dutch ($13.2
bn.), and German ($12.8 bn.). Japanese outlays in the U.S. plummeted
to $3.8 billion in 2001, from $26.0 billion in the prior year.
Not surprisingly, the biggest declines in
FDI last year were centered in the IT/telecommunications industry, where
foreign investors spent $25.9 billion to acquire or establish businesses
in the U.S., compared with a whopping $67.9 billion a year earlier.
A sharp drop-off also occurred in the computer/electronics industry, from
$42.6 billion in 2000 to $10.2 billion in 2001.
Inbound FDI in the U.S., according to the
U.S. Department of Commerce, supported 341,000 (direct) jobs in 2001 and
770,000 (direct) jobs in 2000. This inflow of investment capital represents
a powerful vote of confidence in the long-term stability and attractiveness
of the U.S. economy. Despite the plunging stock market, the recession,
terrorist attacks, Enronitis, et al, foreign investors continue to place
the U.S. near the top of their list of investment destinations. (Ken
Ackbarali)
PR: http://www.bea.doc.gov/bea/newsrel/fdinewsrelease.htm
MAY LOCATION PRODUCTION DAYS STILL LAGGING
According to the Entertainment Industry Development
Corporation (EIDC), off-lot film production activity in May continued to
lag behind last year. The month's total of 2,236 location days was
10.0% below the 2001 count of 2,485 (when the film production frenzy was
starting to wind down). The May 2002 number was also below the April
count of 2,622 days.
TV production was up over the year by 37.1%,
while commercial activity increased by 7.5%. Music (generally a small
number) was below last year by 27.6%. The retarding factor continued
to be "features," which was down by 36.0%. However, the May total
of 824 days was the highest since June 2001 when there were 1,005 feature
location production days. And the number of feature films in "prep"
is running at high levels, which means better times in the second half
of the year.
As far as domestic box office goes, this is
as good as it gets. Year-to-date, the box office is ahead by 21.2%,
while admissions are up by 17.0%. (Wow!) (Jack
Kyser)
AND APRIL TRAFFIC AT BURBANK AIRPORT
. . . or the Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport.
The passenger count for April was 4.0% below last year, which represents
a continuing recovery trend. March was off by 4.2%, February was
down by 6.8%, while January was behind by 5.7%. (Jack
Kyser)
HOUSING AFFORDABILITY DOWN IN APRIL
The Housing Affordability Index (HAI) calculated
by the California Association of Realtors shows increasing difficulty for
current renters to acquire their own homes. The HAI indicates the
percentage of all households able to afford a median-priced home.
California's HAI (for single-family homes) dropped from 29% in March to
27% in April. It was 34% a year ago. For condos, the HAI was
41% in April, barely changed from 42% in March but considerably lower than
the 47% mark scored a year ago. In Southern California, Orange County
was the most unaffordable with an HAI of 23% (April), down from 25% in
March and 28% a year ago. LA County's HAI was 31% in April, down
from 33% in March and 38% a year ago. Ventura County followed with
32% in April, down from 36% in March and 37% a year ago. Riverside
County is catching on quickly. Its HAI was 36% in April, down from
39% in March and 42% a year ago. San Bernardino County remained the
most affordable at 53%, unchanged from March and just slightly lower than
a year ago (54%). (George Huang)
PR: not available online at the time of this writing, please check
http://www.car.org/index.php?id=OTE0
on Tuesday
QUICK STATS:
* Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi/Schroders: US chain store sales for 5/02: +3.4%
over a year ago (4/02: +1.6% o.y.a.)
* BLS: US unemployment rate for 5/02: 5.8% (4/02: 6.0%)
* BLS: US nonfarm employment for 5/02: +41,000 (4/02: +6,000)
* Cal. Assn. of Realtors: Housing Affordability Index for 4/02: 27%
(3/02: 29%)
* Cal. Assn. of Realtors: Housing Affordability Index for Los Angeles
County for 4/02: 31% (3/02: 33%)
* Census: US wholesale trade for 4/02: +1.6% (3/02: +0.1%)
* Census: US wholesale inventories for 4/02: -0.7% (3/02: -0.3%)
* Federal Reserve: US consumer credit for 4/02: +6.3% seasonally-adjusted
annual rate (3/02: +4.8% s.a.a.r.)
The Economic Data Global Express (e-EDGE) is a free service of the Los Angeles County Economic Development Corporation (LAEDC). Permission to quote any proprietary part of this release is granted given proper credit. Distribution is allowed provided that no modifications are made to the original content. Sponsors of this service do not necessarily endorse all opinions stated herein. For more information, please e-mail to research@laedc.org. To contact LAEDC, please call 213-622-4300.
Subscribe to e-EDGE and receive current economic news and major developments. Your e-mail address will not be disclosed to any outside party (including e-EDGE sponsors) under any circumstances.
To send us comments regarding e-EDGE, please e-mail to research@laedc.org.